Archive for #OccupyLSX

A Despatch from OccupyLSX

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , on November 10, 2011 by Jonathan Kent

I’ve wanted to drop in on the OccupyLSX camp outside St Paul’s Cathedral ever since it was set up and on Tuesday I finally got there.

I wandered down with Rupert Read who’d persuaded me to join him at a Progressive Alliance meeting that morning at TUC headquarters.

The Occupy camp had been high on the agenda with two active members of the camp, Tess Carota and Jonathan (? sorry didn’t get your surname) there to speak about it.

Both were eloquent and personable but neither pretended to have any answers to the numerous questions fired at them.  Chief amongst these were how long the camp should remain and how it could draw in the 99% it claims to represent into the process they’ve started.

What Jonathan and Tess did explain was that they see Occupy as part of, perhaps a catalyst for, a conversation – a conversation that our society has to have.

I walked down Holborn to St Paul’s with Tess.  She’s from Philadelphia, the meeting place of the revolutionary Continental Congress, the city where Tom Paine penned Common Sense, where Washington, Adams, Jefferson and their contemporaries declared independence and drew up the Constitution of the United States.

If the Progressive Alliance was a modern congress, the Occupy camp was Valley Forge.  The tents are our pickets and trenches.

I met up with Rupert who was giving a (very good) talk at the University tent on The Spirit Level.  The whole scene reminded me of the free festival circuit of the 1980s.  On display were the fruits of endeavour and creativity and free thinking – posters, discussions, food, music… Rupert and I joined in a guerrilla singing session and belted out ‘It’s a Long Way to Tipperary’ and ‘Pack Up Your Troubles’.  He’s got a good voice.  The police looking on were clearly non-plussed.

What I found most affecting however was the presence of quite a number of people who I presumed were either homeless or marginal.   Tess mentioned on the way down that some can, occasionally, be problematic and that people in this highly-democratic space didn’t feel they had the right to ‘police’ them.

I don’t entirely agree.  Any society has the right to agree certain boundaries to protect the safety and dignity of all.  The key thing is that rules be non discriminatory and applied evenly.

However what I saw were people who’d had no place finding a place and making an effort to contribute.  It spoke volumes to me.  However much we’re encouraged to crave stuff what we really crave is purpose and belonging.  We’re social creatures and we’re happiest in society.  I’m sure Occupy is far from perfect.  I know some of those there find the process of reaching consensus difficult.  However the experiment they’re carrying out matters.  It may turn out just as it turned out for The Diggers on St George’s Hill but whatever happens it serves to remind us that there are other, possibly better, ways of working and being and I doubt anyone who has been a part of it will ever forget it.

St Paul’s – for the 1% or the 99%?

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , on October 22, 2011 by headstrongclub

I’m not an unalloyed fan of the man who gave his name to St Paul’s Cathedral.  Saul of Tarsus was an uncomfortable and divisive figure in early Christianity.  Many of his pronouncements, which reflect his conservative rabbinical background, leave many of us equally uncomfortable today.

Paul had issues with women, gays and men with long hair.  If he’d found himself caught up in the Occupy crowd beside the great London church that bears his name he’d probably chew their ears off.

However that’s as nothing to the roasting he’d have in store for the denizens of the City; the men and women of the City of London Corporation, the trustees of St Pauls and the tens of thousands of highly paid men and women whose relentless pursuit of money strains at the leash of legality and, despite protestations to the contrary, whose employers are not permitted by law to pay heed to the constraints of morality if it curtails their profits.

Arguably Paul’s great contribution to Christian theology was his discourse of righteousness.  In framing his argument Paul pulled together many of the radical threads of Jesus teaching.

It’s best summed up in Matthew 22 36-40 “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbour as yourself.’ 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”

One of the reasons Paul readily seized on this is that it was already well established in Jewish theology.  Paul had studied under Gamaliel, the grandson on Hillel the Elder who had framed the commandment thus: “What is hateful to thee, do not unto thy fellow man: this is the whole Law; the rest is mere commentary” (Shabbat 31a).

But Paul developed the theme.  The aim of the righteous was to maintain a right relationship with God and with one’s fellow people.  Anything that acted as an obstacle to this relationship was an obstacle to salvation.

So though he’s often misquoted as saying that ‘money is the root of all evil’ what Paul actually says is that ‘the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil.’  When the love of money supersedes the love of one’s fellow man it is morally and spiritually corrupting because that love of money prevents one from doing the right thing.

It’s in this light that we should read the parable of the Good Samaritan or the remark about it being easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven.

And so back to St. Paul’s in London.  It has ‘sadly’ announced that it will be closing due to health and safety concerns arising from the #OccupyLSX protest.  It smacks of moral blackmail.

The Dean of St Paul’s, Graeme Knowles, explained that it was “simply not possible to fulfil our day to day obligations to worshippers, visitors and pilgrims in current circumstances”.  The implicit message is clear – these dreadful protesters are preventing good people from worshipping.

Aside from the fact that the credibility of this assertion is in doubt, as the Rt. Revd. Knowles would be the first to point out, God is everywhere, not least in the dozens of underused churches that dot the city of London, within a few hundred yards of St Pauls.  Indeed given how few people actually live in the Square Mile, the City of London probably has more churches per head of population than anywhere else on earth.

The Rt. Revd. Knowles should remember that St Paul’s is not just a place of worship, it is a symbol.  It was a symbol of London’s resilience and defiance during the Blitz.  He and his fellow Canons need to decide whether during the worst economic crisis in 80 years it’s a symbol of the 99% or of the 1%, of the poor, the needy and the dispossessed or of the city’s rich men and women stuck trying to squeeze through their own eyes of needles.

You can see the cathedral’s dilemma.  As its website reads ‘We are extremely proud of the close partnerships we have forged and continue to nurture with our corporate neighbours.’  Those corporate neighbours give millions of pounds a year to the cathedral and they want the protestors to go.

The City of London Corporation has called on the protesters to leave.  Well there’s a surprise – it’s the corporate interests that the CLC represents, and that enjoy such close links with St Paul’s, that the protesters are there to protest about.  It’s like Margaret Thatcher telling the striking miners ‘move along now, you’ve had your fun’.  Preposterous.

In truth it shouldn’t be a difficult choice.  All the Canons need to do is to listen to their hearts and consider the words of the man whose name their cathedral bears, and then they’d surely have no trouble in making the right – indeed the righteous decision.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.